Where Should We Publish*
As the pressure to publish increases, so does the existence of unverified journals that prioritize profit over scholarship, often lacking legitimate peer-review and/or editorial services. Publishing in these venues imperils research work, wastes research funds, and possibly hinders the dissemination of the researcher’s work.
Faculty and students are therefore encouraged to watch for these common "red flags" identified by academic institutions and experts.
AGGRESSIVE MARKETING
Unsolicited, flattering emails that promise rapid publication within a few days; high-quality peer review takes time.
BEALL’S LIST
Journal or its publisher is in the Beall's List. Although not perfect, this List can be a starting point for identifying potentially questionable journals. However, it should not be used as the sole determinant of credibility.
SWEEPING SCOPE TO ATTRACT NUMEROUS SUBMISSIONS
Broad coverage of multiple, unrelated disciplines (e.g., engineering, literature, and medicine), It may signal lack of niche and specialization to ensure quality control across all fields the journal claims to cover.
WRONG CLAIMS
False or misleading claims about indexation status, often listing prestigious databases when they are not actually included.
MIMICKING REPUTABLE JOURNALS
Some journals intentionally mimic the names, websites, logos or branding of legitimate journals to deceive authors and readers, charging high fees without providing rigorous peer review.
RAPID PUBLICATION PROCESS AND LITTLE PEER REVIEW
While some reputable journals offer legitimate accelerated tracks, promise of rapid publication—especially when paired with upfront fees—can be a sign of potentially predatory, low-quality journals. The pressure for speed may compromise the rigor of the evaluation process.
DUBIOUS EDITORIAL BOARD
Journals that list high-profile academics (including deceased researchers)—on their boards without their knowledge or permission; this mimics credibility and attracts submissions.
*A digest of the talk “Where Should I Publish? (Recognizing Predatory Publications and Safeguarding Research Integrity: Some Notes for Conversation)” by Dr Arlene Yandug. 07 April 2025, Research Month, KURO
